
Earlier this week, we joined in celebrating World Day Against Speciesism â a day dedicated to opposing the belief system that underpins, empowers, and defends nonhuman experimentation.
But researchers do even worse than adhering to speciesism â they treat nonhuman animals as other than living beings altogether.
As scientists themselves say: â . . . the animal is perceived only through the objective conditions of its environment. The naturalization of animal consciousness thus perhaps gives us a technical view of animals as beings that can be used by science as mere resources.â
Researchers fully objectify nonhuman animals.
They do this â they âde-animalizeâ nonhuman animals â in far more subtle ways than the blatant horrors they inflict upon them in experiments.
Inside laboratories, nonhuman animals are:
- â[C]reated, converted into products, purchased, shipped, and conveniently stored.â
- Treated as âinterchangeable and anonymous objectsâ, identified by numbers posted on their cages and, sometimes, tattooed onto their bodies or denoted by holes punched in their ears.
- Transformed into âdata or silent research collaboratorsâ.
- Listed under âsuppliesâ in grant applications, listed as âmaterialsâ in scientific publications, and bought through catalogs.
- Labeled according to their âexperimental purposeâ, such as âdonorsâ, âbleedersâ, âbreedersâ, and âjunkâ.
- Referred to as âpreparationsâ, âspecimensâ, and âtoolsâ.
In these ways, the historical conception of animals as âbeast machinesâ is still very much alive today.
Infamous vivisector Rene Descarte is credited with designating nonhuman animals as âbeast machinesâ. According to his conception, nonhumans are mere automata, and their cries of pain are âmere reflexâ â âmere mechanical reactions of robots . . . interpreted as the squeaking of unoiled cogs.â
Denying that animals â(despite all appearances to the contrary) were able to sufferâ, Descartesâ theory became âwidely used as a justification for experimenting on live animalsâŠ.â This theory became powerful as a âmethodological principle, as an approach to researchâ.
And, today, the âmachine of animal experimentationâ keeps Descartesâ âbeast-machineâ theory in practice.
Though the Cartesian âbeast-machineâ theory has been opposed since its formation (and has been entirely disproven by science itself), the idea that nonhuman animals are nothing more than objects â and, therefore, outside the sphere of moral consideration â remains all too entrenched.
It continues to serve as a hollow but convenient claim for members of an industry that get paid to torture nonhuman animals with impunity. To cut them apart. To do to them that which would be illegal if done to a human. To kill them.
Nonhuman animals are not objects. They are living beings. And they are the same as humans in all ways that matter.
Nonhuman animals commodified by the research industry need our help. We wonât stop fighting for their freedom until every last cage is empty. Are you with us? If so, make the pledge now: I pledge to keep fighting for better health and effective cures for all, at the expense of none.
Source: Riseforanimals.org